Harsh Montana Corp. v. Locke
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
Plaintiff brought this action to have an alleged mechanic’s lien declared invalid and to have it cancelled and discharged of record.
The trial court sitting without a jury granted the relief sought by plaintiff and defendant has appealed from the judgment.
The complaint alleges that palintiff corporation was organized under the laws of Montana; that on October 4, 1951, Harsh Investment Company, an Oregon corporation, and Harold J. Schnitzer entered into a written agreement with defendant, whereby it was agreed in substance that if Harsh should be awarded any contract by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Juckem v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Cooke v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Brennan v. City of KalispellMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Waddell v. School District No. 3Montana Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Figgins v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- Salt Lake Hardware Co. v. StefflerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964