Supple v. Luckenbach
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was given prior to the entry of judgment and, therefore, the appeal was prematurely taken. It is well settled in this state that an appeal from a judgment taken prior to the rendition of the judgment is prematurely taken and does not vest the appellate court with jurisdiction to entertain the attempted appeal. (Aspegren & Co., Inc., v. Sherman, Swan & Co., 199 Cal. 532 [250 Pac. 400].)
In this action the trial court on January 13, 1938, filed a paper entitled, “Memorandum Decision and Order for Findings” in which he stated that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Easterly v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Exterstein v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. CrawshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Petroleum Midway Co. v. ZahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Glass v. Windsor Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.