Legal Opinion

Benjamin Barry Kramer v. Keith E. Olson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 2003No. 03-2187PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Per curiam

Federal prisoner Benjamin Kramer petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his conviction under Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999). The district court concluded that Kramer could not proceed under § 2241 because the principal means of attacking a federal conviction, a motion to vacate un der 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was not inadequate to test the legality of Kramer’s conviction. The district court accordingly characterized Kramer’s filing as a mislabeled § 2255 motion and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Kramer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Michael Hill v. Robert WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Benjamin B. Kramer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Maldonado-Torres v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Gravitt, Samuel v. Bezy, Mark A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. McCall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API