Benjamin Barry Kramer v. Keith E. Olson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Federal prisoner Benjamin Kramer petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his conviction under Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999). The district court concluded that Kramer could not proceed under § 2241 because the principal means of attacking a federal conviction, a motion to vacate un der 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was not inadequate to test the legality of Kramer’s conviction. The district court accordingly characterized Kramer’s filing as a mislabeled § 2255 motion and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Kramer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Michael Hill v. Robert WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Benjamin B. Kramer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Maldonado-Torres v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Gravitt, Samuel v. Bezy, Mark A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- McCall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.