Eastman v. Waisman

Plaintiff claims the record raises no question of law relying on Head & Dowst Co. v. Breeders’ Club, 75 N. H. 449, 450: “that a party cannot question the sufficiency of evidence to support a verdict or material issue in a case by motion after the case has been submitted to the court or Jury, or by an exception to the verdict.” This represents the usual practice in this state and has been followed generally. Hening’s Digest, 1242; Bacon v. Thompson, 87 N. H. 270; Pflug v. Pflug, ante, 134.

This rule has certain limitations and exceptions which, however, do not benefit the defendant. “But this…