Legal Opinion

Home Ins. Co. v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1938No. 6 Div. 320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This action is by a taxpayer against the petitioner, the City of Birmingham, to recover money paid “under mistake of law or fact,” and is rested on the provisions of sections 3144, 3145 and 3146, of the Code 1923, the last-mentioned having been amended by Act approved July 28, 1931, limiting the right to payment made within one year of the commencement of the action. Gen.Acts 1931, p. 811.

The basis of the right of action as prescribed by the statute is: “The payment of money under mistake of law or fact Upon any illegal tax assessment made under color of any law, special or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re FiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Deason v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. National Bank of Boaz v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Fruitticher Electric Co. v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graves v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. City of Birmingham v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Cabiness v. City of TuscaloosaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. City of Birmingham v. Home Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. W. S. Brewbaker, Inc. v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API