Legal Opinion

Alabama Mortgage & Securities Corp. v. Chinery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1939No. 6 Div. 330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action of assumpsit by the appellant, against appellee, on a promissory note made by the defendant on the 16th day of November, 1931, for $1486.12, to Southern Mortgage & Securities Corporation, with the interest thereon, alleged to be “due and unpaid” on the filing of the complaint, June 12, 1937.

The plaintiff sues as indorsee of the note. The defendant filed, “in open court” on March 7, 1938, six special pleas, lettered from A to F inclusive, in legal effect admitting the indebtedness — the general issue not being interposed — and seeking to invoke the benefits of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. JaffeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Brown v. . KirkpatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API