Legal Opinion

Mayers v. Barte

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1981No. 15149PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

In this original mandamus proceeding, the relator, Pauline Myers, seeks to have the freeholder eligibility requirement for membership on a municipal planning commission declared unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection principles. This provision is found in W. Va. Code, 8-24-5, 1 and a similar provision is contained in Section 151.01 of the Code of the City of Wheeling.

Relator relies on several United States Supreme Court cases which have held that a freeholder requirement for holding office on public boards violates equal protection concepts. In Turner v. Fouche,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Turner v. FoucheSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Daily Gazette Co. v. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State BarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bailey v. TrubyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Hamstead v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API