Legal Opinion

Amergen Energy Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 8, 2013No. 09-108 TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Bush, Judge.

This ease is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment as to Counts I-IV of the complaint, filed under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Count V, the only other count in the complaint, has been the subject of successful settlement negotiations. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied.

BACKGROUND

I. Relevant Facts

A. Overview

This is a readjustment of partnership items case under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amergen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. AmerGen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API