Legal Opinion

Doherty & Co. v. Youngblut

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9342; No. 9450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Morgan District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge. Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

THE defendants in error move to dismiss on several grounds.

*595The plaintiffs in error answer that defendants in error cannot do this, because they have already moved and failed, and the present grounds were available at the time of the former motion, and plaintiffs in error call attention to the fact that since the former motion they have expended large sums in the preparation and printing of abstracts and briefs. The defendants in error reply that the grounds of their motion are jurisdictional, and that this court cannot proceed under present conditions.

We think the position of plaintiffs in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Denver National Bank v. GrimesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Burke v. Boulder Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Philipsky v. Scheflow & MonahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API