Legal Opinion
Richard Charles Bradenburg v. William C. Beaman, Richard Charles Bradenburg v. Duane Shillinger, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1980No. 80-1645, 80-1646PublishedCited by 176 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate records, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of these appeals. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The causes are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The captioned cases are illustrative of the problems encountered by federal district courts in dealing with pro se litigants, especially when simple procedural requirements are ignored.
From the records in these two cases, it appears that in April of 1980 appellant Bradenburg tendered to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Jack Leon LucasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by176 opinions
- Nielsen v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- John Carpenter v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Nielsen v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Robert Hayes v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Ahlgrim v. WestDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.