Legal Opinion
MB Advanced Equipment, Inc. v. MVAIC
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 1, 2015Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Katherine A. Levine, J.
*1050Defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) moves to dismiss the claim brought by plaintiff MB Advanced Equipment, Inc., a medical services company, based upon the assignor Dan Miller St. Hilaire’s ineligibility for MVAIC benefits under article 52 of the Insurance Law for failure to meet the requirements of a “qualified person.”
At trial, MVAIC’s claims representative testified that MVAIC only opens a file upon receipt of a bill from a medical provider, and that upon receipt of the bill MVAIC sends out a letter to the provider…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- East Acupuncture, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Country-Wide InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Canty v. Motor Vehicle Accident inDemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Englington Medical, P.C. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.