Legal Opinion

People v. Mock Ming Fat

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1927No. Docket No. 1459PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLTJCAS, J.,

pro tem. — Appellants were found guilty of the crime of assault with intent to commit murder.

This case presents but a single question on appeal. Appellants assign as error the refusal of the trial court to give the following instruction: “If you believe from the evidence that defendants, or any of them, did not commit an assault upon the person of Yee Moon with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit murder, and if you believe from the evidence that defendants, or any of them, did commit an assault upon Yee Moon with a deadly weapon without the intent to commit murder, then it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. MacIelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. State v. HyamsUtah Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. HeffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API