People v. Mock Ming Fat
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McLTJCAS, J.,
pro tem. — Appellants were found guilty of the crime of assault with intent to commit murder.
This case presents but a single question on appeal. Appellants assign as error the refusal of the trial court to give the following instruction: “If you believe from the evidence that defendants, or any of them, did not commit an assault upon the person of Yee Moon with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit murder, and if you believe from the evidence that defendants, or any of them, did commit an assault upon Yee Moon with a deadly weapon without the intent to commit murder, then it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. MacIelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State v. HyamsUtah Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. HeffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.