Legal Opinion

Gang v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 6, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03267Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CAROL JEAN GANG, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:20-cv-3267 v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Carol Jean Gang, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (ECF No. 7), the Commissioner’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API