Legal Opinion

Raymond Smith, et al. v. Joi Harris, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 21, 2026No. 2:26-cv-10014Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 26-10014 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN v. JOI HARRIS, et al., Defendants. _________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [#6] AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#6]. Upon review of the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that oral argument will not aid in the disposition of the motion, and thus it will be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API