Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Germania Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1906No. Nos. 14,615—(110)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Brill, J.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

This action was brought' to restrain the defendant from using a private alleyway or from interfering with the plaintiffs’ use thereof. *90The answer put in issue plaintiffs’ title to the alleyway, asserted a right on defendant’s part to use,the alleyway, admitted that it used the same, but denied that it interfered with plaintiffs’ use thereof. The action was tried by the court, which made findings of fact and conclusions of law, establishing plaintiffs’ right in the alley, finding that defendant interfered with plaintiffs’ use, and directing judgment restraining defendant from such interference.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Winston v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Greene v. CannyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Hoyt v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kirkham v. SharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Farnes v. Freeman LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Salo v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
  5. Stevens v. Bird-Jex Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API