Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Hooper

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1987No. 55660PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1ConcurrenceJustice Ryan

specially concurring:

I join in the supervisory order entered herein; however, by reason of the comments of my dissenting colleagues, I am compelled to express in writing the reasons for my concurrence with the supervisory order remanding to the trial court the cases involving a Batson issue (Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 476 U.S. 79, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69,106 S. Ct. 1712).

At the trial of the cases which we now consider, the issue of the misuse of peremptory challenges to exclude blacks was considered under the law as announced in Swain v. Alabama (1965), 380 U.S. 202, 13 L. Ed. 2d 759, 85 S. Ct. 824.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Lowden DavidCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Floyd Richardson v. Michael LemkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API