Legal Opinion
California ex rel. Rono, LLC v. Altus Finance S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2003No. 02-56038PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 29.8 of the California Rules of Court, we grant the motion of the Attorney General and request the California Supreme Court to decide the two questions of California law set forth in Part II of this order. This case is withdrawn from submission until further order of this court and all further proceedings in this court are stayed pending final action by the California Supreme Court.
There are no controlling precedents resolving these important questions, and the answers will in all probability determine the outcome of the present appeal. Our phrasing of the questions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Associated General Contractors of America, San Diego Chapter, Inc. v. California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Sierra Club v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Aubart v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.