Town of Saukville v. Town of Grafton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ozaukee County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This was an action to compel the town of Grafton to pay the town of Saulcville the sum of $45, which said town of Saulcville had expended in the support and maintenance of one Christian Ebert, a pauper, who, the town of Saulcville charges, had a legal settlement in said town of Grafton, and that such town was consequently liable to the town of Saulcville for his support. There is no question made as to the regularity of the proceedings on the part of the town of Saulcville to charge the town of Grafton with the support furnished to the said Christian Ebert if he had a legal settlement in said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wisconsin River Improvement Co. v. LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Cramer v. HanafordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Town of Scott v. Town of ClaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Thomas v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Mead v. Supervisors of Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hoff v. HackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Town of Rolling v. City of AntigoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Town of Ellington v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Will of BrittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Dane County v. Barron CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.