Legal Opinion

Ex parte Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 2015No. 1140594Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

Charleston D. Thomas, an inmate, filed a petition for postconviction relief under Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P. The Jefferson Circuit Court summarily dismissed the petition. The Court of Criminal Appeals, by unpublished memorandum, affirmed the summary dismissal of Thomas’s petition, concluding that Thomas’s Rule 32 petition was untimely because, at the time he filed his Rule 32 petition, Thomas had not paid the filing fee or filed a request to proceed informa pauperis. Thomas v. State (No. CR-12-0966, Jan. 30, 2015), 207 So.3d 773 (Ala.Crim.App.2015) (table). Thomas petitioned this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ex Parte AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Beamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API