Wiltse v. Holt

Action by Drury Holt, Jr., against Oliver Wiltse, Nathan J. Foust and J. Murray Rawls, for false imprisonment. ■

Wiltse answered separately in three paragraphs. The second paragraph was in general denial, and the first and third set up special matters in defence, to which demurrers were severally sustained.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment against Wiltse for the sum of $198, but failed in his action against Foust and Rawls. Wiltse, appealing, complains only of the decisions of the circuit court sustaining demurrers to the first and third paragraphs of his answer.

The first paragraph…