Legal Opinion

Bloomingdale v. B. M. Du Rell & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the second judicial district, Boise county..

1Opinion of the Court

McBeide, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court, Smith, J., and Kelly, J., concurring.

This was an action brought against B. M. Du Eell & Co., wbo were charged in tbe complaint to be a firm composed of three defendants, to wit, B. M. Du Eell, William B. Hughes, and Edward Webb, to recover damages for injuries done to goods placed in possession of tbe defendants, wbo are alleged to be common carriers, for tbe purpose of transportation from tbe town of Umatilla, Oregon, to Idaho Citj, in tbe territory of Idaho.

Tbe complaint is in tbe usual form, and tbe summons and complaint were duly served…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Veazie v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Hirschfield v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Shurtliff v. Extension Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Stout v. McNaryIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Farrar v. ParrishIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API