Legal Opinion
DiCrescenzo v. O'Donnell
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 5, 2023No. 1:23-cv-11934Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AMANDA DICRESCENZO, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-11934-TSH THOMAS O’DONNELL, Defendant. ORDER HILLMAN, J. September 5, 2023 1. Plaintiff Amanda DiCrescenzo’s (“DiCrescenzo”) motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is ALLOWED. Because DiCrescenzo is proceeding in forma pauperis, the complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Section 1915 authorizes the federal courts to dismiss an action in which a plaintiff seeks to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee if the action fails to state a claim on which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Gonzalez GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Instituto De Educacion Universal Corp. v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.