Legal Opinion

In Re Dydo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 N.J. Super. 594 (1954)

103 A.2d 60

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BLAZEK DYDO, DECEASED.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Probate Division.

Decided February 9, 1954.

Mr. Lawrence Friedman argued for the motion (Mr. Chester L. Robak, attorney).

Mr. Alexander Permison argued against the motion.

FOLEY, J.C.C.

The plaintiff executrix commenced an action in the County Court by complaint and order to show cause. The complaint sought discovery of "certain papers, bank books, insurance policies, clothing, articles of furniture and other personal effects" left by the decedent in a room…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tumarkin v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Donnelly v. RitzendollarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Masi v. MesticeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. In Re YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Park Oil, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  2. In Re CostaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API