Legal Opinion

Morrissy v. Rhinelander Real Estate Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1219 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

On June 11, 1908, the Rhinelander Real Estate Company and the defendant Chisolm, each owners of adjoining property on West Fourteenth street, entered into leases of said properties to the plaintiff for a term of years. The said leases contained the following covenants: “The party of the second part further covenants and agrees with the party of the first part that he will, at his own expense, perform, comply with and discharge all orders, requirements, rules and regulations of every nature and kind whatsoever of the Corporation of the City of New York, or of any Department thereof,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of New York v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Herald Square Realty Co. v. Saks & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. Robert Hoe Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Brokaw v. SherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Deutsch v. Robert Hoe Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API