Legal Opinion

Brokaw v. Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1914Published

Appeal from Judgment on Report of Referee. Action by Isaac V. Brokaw and others against Louis Sherry. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed. The following is the opinion of the referee: Under date of June 5, 1896, the plaintiff Isaac V. Brokaw, as owner of the premises therein described at the southeast corner of Fifth avenue and Forty-Fourth street in the city of New York, entered into two certain leases or contracts with the defendant Louis Sherry.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Judgment on Report of Referee. Action by Isaac V. Brokaw and others against Louis Sherry. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed. The following is the opinion of the referee: Under date of June 5, 1896, the plaintiff Isaac V. Brokaw, as owner of the premises therein described at the southeast corner of Fifth avenue and Forty-Fourth street in the city of New York, entered into two certain leases or contracts with the defendant Louis Sherry. By the first of these instruments, hereinafter termed the “short lease,” Brokaw leased to Sherry the land therein described…

1Per curiam

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of referee. See, also, Herald Square Realty Co. v. Saks & Co., 157 App. Div. 566, 142 N. Y. Supp. 808, and Morrissy v. Rhinelander Real Estate Co., 158 App. Div. 533, 143 N. Y. Supp. 826.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrissy v. Rhinelander Real Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Herald Square Realty Co. v. Saks & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API