Legal Opinion
Teno v. Iwanski
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 29, 2019No. 3:18-CV-159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*806Before the Court are motions to dismiss by Defendants Steve Mead, Leslie Mead, and Steve Emert (Docs. 29, 39) and by Defendant Myron Iwanski (Doc. 37). Plaintiff, Doyle Thornton Teno, III, responded in opposition. (Doc. 45.) The Meads and Iwanski both filed replies. (Docs. 46, 47.) By leave of Court, Plaintiff filed a sur-reply to Iwanski's reply. (Doc. 51.)
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff and three of the four Defendants in this case hold positions with Anderson County, Tennessee. Plaintiff is the Delinquent Tax Attorney and Deputy Trustee for Anderson…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.