Legal Opinion

Pipe & Piling Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd. v. Betterman & Katelman

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1999No. A-97-1327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

Pipe and Piling Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd. (P&P), a foreign corporation, sued Betterman & Katelman (B&K), a Nebraska general partnership, to recover $50,000 of the more than $130,000 P&P paid to B&K for legal services rendered from September 3, 1991, to June 11, 1993, on the ground that the legal fees were “excessive and/or unnecessary for a law firm which had environmental law litigation experience.” B&K had recovered the last $8,230 of those fees in a previous action and moved for and received a summary judgment of dismissal in the instant case upon the basis of res judicata, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Estate of WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kerndt v. RonanNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. JR Simplot Co. v. JelinekNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, P.C. v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cole v. WilsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re Interest of Jaden H.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API