Pipe & Piling Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd. v. Betterman & Katelman
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hannon, Judge.
Pipe and Piling Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd. (P&P), a foreign corporation, sued Betterman & Katelman (B&K), a Nebraska general partnership, to recover $50,000 of the more than $130,000 P&P paid to B&K for legal services rendered from September 3, 1991, to June 11, 1993, on the ground that the legal fees were “excessive and/or unnecessary for a law firm which had environmental law litigation experience.” B&K had recovered the last $8,230 of those fees in a previous action and moved for and received a summary judgment of dismissal in the instant case upon the basis of res judicata, but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Estate of WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Kerndt v. RonanNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- JR Simplot Co. v. JelinekNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, P.C. v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Cole v. WilsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Interest of Jaden H.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.