Legal Opinion

Pius Augustine and Dorothy Augustine v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1987No. 85-1792, 85-2791PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

Appellants Pius Augustine and his wife, Dorothy, brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for damages arising from alleged negligent medical treatment which Mr. Augustine received at the Medical Center operated by the Veterans Administration in Denver, Colorado. The action was based upon claims of alleged malpractice, lack of informed consent, and negligent misrepresentation by government employees at the Medical Center.

In September, 1981, plaintiff Pius Augustine underwent a non-surgical procedure in which an inflated balloon was used to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fernon D. Marshall v. Ford Motor Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Cleverock Energy Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Martin Trepel and Trepel Petroleum Corporation, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Terry Denise Velez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and Hilda TolsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Ebert v. Lamar Truck PlazaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  4. Michael F. Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Persaud v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API