Legal Opinion
Bunger v. Lawson Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1998No. 97-341PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We hold that R.C. 4123.01(C) and 4123.74 do not foreclose an employee who has suffered purely psychological injuries from pursuing a common-law remedy against her employer.
R.C. 4123.01(C) defines the term “injury” as it is used in R.C. Chapter 4123, which sets forth Ohio’s workers’ compensation system. The statute reads:
“(C) ‘Injury’ includes any injury, whether caused by external accidental means or accidental in character and result, received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment. ‘Injury’ does not include:
“(1) Psychiatric conditions except where the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Heiner v. MoretuzzoOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by31 opinions
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- Arrington v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.