Legal Opinion

Kasper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1981No. 63624, (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

(for affirmance and remand). This case involves the question of whether a provision in a judgment of divorce, which purportedly reflects an oral property settlement agreement that obligates one party to maintain a minor child as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, may be enforced.

The trial court concluded that such a provision exceeded the statutory authority of the court and therefore declined to enforce it. The Court of Appeals reversed by peremptory order predicated upon the "clear precedent” of Krueger v Krueger, 88 Mich App 722; 278 NW2d 514 (1979), lv den 406…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. FredrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. West v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Richards v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Merchant v. MerchantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PersonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. Hoffman v. HoffmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In Re Monreal EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API