Kasper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blair Moody, Jr., J.
(for affirmance and remand). This case involves the question of whether a provision in a judgment of divorce, which purportedly reflects an oral property settlement agreement that obligates one party to maintain a minor child as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, may be enforced.
The trial court concluded that such a provision exceeded the statutory authority of the court and therefore declined to enforce it. The Court of Appeals reversed by peremptory order predicated upon the "clear precedent” of Krueger v Krueger, 88 Mich App 722; 278 NW2d 514 (1979), lv den 406…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. FredrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- West v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Richards v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Merchant v. MerchantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PersonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Hoffman v. HoffmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re Monreal EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.