Legal Opinion

In the Interest of T. M. S.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 2000No. A99A2399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Claiming insufficient evidence, the appellant appeals the termination of her parental rights to her two minor children. Because the trial court was authorized to find that there was clear and convincing evidence in favor of termination, we affirm.

1. In reviewing a biological parent’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights to custody have been lost. In the Interest of A. C.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. In the Interest of A. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. In the Interest of L. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. In the Interest of M. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. In the Interest of D. C. N. KCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Interest of C. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API