Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Regents of University of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1993No. 92-16022PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
993 F.2d 710
83 Ed. Law Rep. 53
Michael E. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Clara Sue
Kidwell, Daniel F. Melia, Joseph Cerny, Lucien Lecam,
Rudolph Beran, Nora B. Lee, Eric L. Lehmann, Jim Pitman, and
David Brillinger, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-16022.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 12, 1993.*
Decided May 21, 1993.
Michael E. Taylor, pro se.
James E. Holst, Christine Helwick, Eric K. Behrens, Office of Gen. Counsel, University of California, Oakland, CA, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ruth Ann Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh, Wesley W. Posvar and Trevor Melia, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, Mary-Ann Bishop CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- McDougal v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Felton v. Unisource Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Linville v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- C.S. v. CouchDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Association of Mexican-American Educators ("AMAE") v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Martinez v. Marin Sanitary ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Whitehorn v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.