Legal Opinion
R. Bertil Peterson v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c is supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner’s challenge to the administrative determination rests upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the fact-finder to resolve, and we see no basis to overturn the factfinder’s determination (see Matter of Hildreth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 83 AD3d 838 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hildreth v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Snitow v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Arken v. New York City Dept. of Fin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Matievskaya v. State of New York Dept. of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014