Murray v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters' statement of tbe case: The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowry, Judge
Toward the close of the active business of the last term this cause with certain others which had been dismissed under the act of March 3, 1891 26 Stats., 851, providing for the adjudication and payment of claims growing out of the depredations of Indians, was sought to be reinstated after the lapse of the term. Approximately 3,000 cases had been dismissed, some of them without reserve or qualification, but most of them (as stated in open court at the time of the discontinuances) “ without jirejudice.”
When the reinstatements were attempted and the few cases submitted came to be considered by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohlendiek v. SchulerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Hubard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- Stanton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922