Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
Before the. court is cross-defendant’s motion to partially dismiss for failure to join an indispensible party; cross-defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment; defendants’ motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a stay of discovery; plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery; and, motions by defendants and cross-defendant to strike plaintiff’s rebuttal to the above mentioned motions. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
For the reasons stated below, cross-defendant’s motion to partially dismiss for failure to join…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Winthrop F. Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Limited and B. Francis SaulCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Integrated Business Information Service (Proprietary) Ltd. v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Suprex Corp. v. Lee Scientific, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Devalk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Samuels v. WilderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.