Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1931No. 8315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Every contract made with a county is required to be in Writing and entered on the minutes of the proper authorities entrusted with the county affairs. Civil Code (1910), § 386. Where a person has a written contract with a county, he has the legal right to have the same entered on such minutes; and if the proper county authorities fail or refuse to enter such contract, the judge of the superior court should by mandamus compel the authorities to so enter it. In a proceeding for mandamus to compel the performance of such duty, the court will not inquire into the validity of the contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Milburn v. Commissioners of Glynn CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. H. G. Brown Family Ltd. Partnership v. City of Villa RicaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Hatcher v. Hancock County Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. McGinty v. PickeringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API