Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. Every contract made with a county is required to be in Writing and entered on the minutes of the proper authorities entrusted with the county affairs. Civil Code (1910), § 386. Where a person has a written contract with a county, he has the legal right to have the same entered on such minutes; and if the proper county authorities fail or refuse to enter such contract, the judge of the superior court should by mandamus compel the authorities to so enter it. In a proceeding for mandamus to compel the performance of such duty, the court will not inquire into the validity of the contract…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Milburn v. Commissioners of Glynn CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. G. Brown Family Ltd. Partnership v. City of Villa RicaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Hatcher v. Hancock County Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- McGinty v. PickeringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.