Cespedes v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that a permanent resident is removable if he “violates the portion of a [domestic-violence] protection order that involves protection against credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, or bodily injury.” 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii). The issue before us is whether violation of an order prohibiting contact with a potential victim satisfies the statute. We hold that it does.
I. BACKGROUND
Petitioner Jose Ramon Cespedes, a native and citizen of Venezuela, entered the United States as a nonimmigrant tourist on January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alvarez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- OBSHATKOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- Garcia-Hernandez v. BoenteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Ashish Sunuwar v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Emmanuel Tiah v. Todd BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.