Heller International Corp. v. Sharp
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
Heller International appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for a judgment *852notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial. Heller contends that the district court’s refusal to give a proffered jury instruction requires reversal of the judgment and remand for a new trial. Given the facts presented here, we agree. Heller also appeals the district court’s award of costs to defendants as prevailing parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). That claim is rendered premature by our reversal of the judgment, and the cost award will have to be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Antonelli v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brujis v. ShawDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Oxford Bank and Trust v. HARTFORD ACC. AND INDEMNITY CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Heller International Corporation v. Alec SharpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Oxford Bank & Trust v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998