Legal Opinion

People v. Huggins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), the evidence that the complainant attempted to prevent the theft of his car by standing at the driver’s side door with his hands pressed against the window, and, in order to avoid being struck by the car, was forced to jump back when defendant turned and pulled out of the parking spot, was sufficient to satisfy the element of forcible taking. The jury reasonably could have found that defendant’s act of driving the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. State v. HawkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API