Showers v. Spangler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
■ BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
I
Following a warrantless search of their home and business, Michael and Ann Showers brought this civil rights action against Wildlife Conservation Officer Steven Spangler and his co-defendants — all officers or officials of the Pennsylvania Game Commission. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants after finding them entitled to qualified immunity. Because we conclude, however, that an objectively reasonable law enforcement officer in Spangler’s position would know that searches such as the one made in this case may only…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michael W. Showers v. Steven A. SpanglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Drakes Collision, Inc. v. Auto Club Group Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020