Legal Opinion

Houston v. Deal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1991No. A90A1636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Appellant W. L. Houston sued Tilman Deal for trespass and wilful tortious damage to Houston’s property. Deal countersued, claiming the subject property was a road which belonged to him by operation of law because it bounded his property. The trial court granted summary judgment to Deal, by authority of Johnson & Co. v. Arnold, 91 Ga. 659 (18 SE 370). Held:

We reverse the summary judgment. This case is not controlled by Johnson & Co. v. Arnold, but by Rolleston v. Sea Island Properties, 254 Ga. 183, 187 (327 SE2d 489).

All this land originally belonged to W. L. Houston.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Johnson & Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Rolleston v. Sea Island Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Martin v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stutts v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Warner v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API