Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Pratt

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1941No. L. A. 16071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff is submitted on the judgment roll and the appellant’s opening brief.

The judgment roll shows the following facts:

The defendant Leonard G. Nicoll was the inventor of a method of making photographic reproductions in color, for which a United States patent had issued, of a “one-shot” color camera, and various parts, processes and secret formulae in connection therewith. In August, 1935, Nicoll entered into an agreement with Harry G. Bowman, Jr., wherein Nicoll agreed to make such reproductions and Bowman agreed to equip a laboratory studio and to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Meili v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
  2. City of Chula Vista v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Smith v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Luchs v. OrmsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Southern California Sunbelt Developers, Inc. v. Banyan Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API