Legal Opinion
County of Niagara v. Netherlands Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 8, 2020No. 20-554-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
20-554-cv County of Niagara v. Netherlands Insurance Co. et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- General Accident Insurance Group v. CirucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Retail Holdings, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Schwebel v. CrandallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- DRK, LLC v. Burlington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.