Legal Opinion

Tiffany Studios v. . Seibert

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 14, 1917, in favor of the respondents, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 14, 1917, in favor of the respondents, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. William B. Dana, by his will, devised certain real property to his executors in trust and directed that the income be paid to his daughter Ethel and his son William in equal portions during their lives, the survivor to receive during his or her life the portion which the deceased would have received if living. By a subsequent provision of his will…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of MazzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. In re MazzoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In re New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API