Hudson v. Leopold
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
This is an action to rescind a deed. Respondent’s complaint alleged undue influence and incapacity. The trial judge, without reference, found the deed to be the product of undue influence. This appeal followed. We reverse.
First, appellant argues the trial judge erred in placing with her the burden to disprove the allegation of undue influence. The lower court reasoned the confidential relationship between the parties gave rise to a presumption of undue influence, thus shifting the burden of proof. This was error.
A deed regular and valid on its face raises a presumption of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Dubose v. KellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- In Re Last Will and Testament of SmoakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Baynard v. UlmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Grant v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixon v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Middleton Ex Rel. Estate of Burkett v. SuberSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Shirey v. BishopCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020