Legal Opinion

Jackson Sleigh Co. v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by the Jackson Sleigh Company against William J. Holmes for goods sold and delivered. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought on the common counts to recover a balance due on account for buggies and sleighs sold by the plaintiff to the defendant in the year 1898. Defense, recoupment for defects in the buggies furnished. Plaintiff recovered, and the defendant brings error.

Three grounds for reversal are urged in this court: First, that the court erred in excluding proof of injury to the defendant’s business, as furnishing a basis for a measure of damages; second, that the court erred in permitting plaintiff’s counsel to show by defendant what the buggies purchased by him were resold for; and,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKinnon v. McEwanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huler v. NasserMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Henry v. HobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hardy v. StoppelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API