Legal Opinion
Cannon v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-0133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs represent a class of retired District of Columbia police officers subsequently rehired by the District for different jobs. Following their retirements, plaintiffs received pension benefits from the District of Columbia Police Officers and ' Firefighters’ Retirement Plan (“PFRP”). After being rehired, they continued to receive these benefits in addition to their new salaries (a practice commonly referred to as “double dipping”). In early 2012, pursuant to D.C.Code§ 5-723(e), the District began reducing plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cromeartie v. Rcm of Washington, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Chambers v. Capital One Financial CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Shanks v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied CraftworkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026