Legal Opinion

Goldberg 168-05 Corp. v. Levy

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff sues to recover for the alleged breach of a leasehold agreement assigned to the plaintiff by the original lessor. As a first cause of action the following in substance is alleged: By agreement dated September 17, 1929, the plaintiff’s assignor agreed to rent certain premises to the defendant Levy for a term expiring September 30, 1938; that the tenant was to pay a minimum rental of $13,800 per year and in addition thereto was to pay the difference between the said sum and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Mann v. . Munch BreweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Carter v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Pernet v. Peabody Engineering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API