City of Bridgeport v. Triple 9 of Broad Street, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this eminent domain matter, the substitute defendant Republic Credit Corporation I (Republic) appeals, challenging the trial court’s decision denying its postjudgment “motion for determination of claims and priorities.” We reverse the decision of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our consideration of the issue on appeal. In 1992, the defendant Triple 9 of Broad Street, Inc. (Triple 9), purchased property at 999 Broad Street in downtown Bridgeport at auction from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for $3,250,000.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Chayoon v. SherlockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Citibank, N.A. v. LindlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- KORES v. CaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Sidorova v. East Lyme Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015