United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VAEKENBURGH, District Judge.
The United States brought suit against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to recover a penalty for failure to comply with the provisions of the Act of Congress approved June 29, 1906 (34 Statutes at Earge 607 [Comp. St. §§ 8651-8654]), commonly known as the Twenty-Eight Hour Law. „ The allegations of the complaint, so far as they are material to this discussion, are as follows: That on or about October 12, 1921, 29 cattle, more or less, were consigned by M. O. Brown, in the *186state of Colorado, to M. O. Brown, care Beetham Commission Company, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
- St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Union Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. Northern Pac. Terminal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909
- United States v. St. Joseph Stockyards Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 600 California Corporation v. Harjean Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1968
- McCallum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. KimbrelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939