Legal Opinion

United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1923No. 6226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VAEKENBURGH, District Judge.

The United States brought suit against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to recover a penalty for failure to comply with the provisions of the Act of Congress approved June 29, 1906 (34 Statutes at Earge 607 [Comp. St. §§ 8651-8654]), commonly known as the Twenty-Eight Hour Law. „ The allegations of the complaint, so far as they are material to this discussion, are as follows: That on or about October 12, 1921, 29 cattle, more or less, were consigned by M. O. Brown, in the *186state of Colorado, to M. O. Brown, care Beetham Commission Company, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
  2. St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  3. Union Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. United States v. Northern Pac. Terminal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909
  5. United States v. St. Joseph Stockyards Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 600 California Corporation v. Harjean Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1968
  2. McCallum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. KimbrelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API